Checking their contribution lists tells easily which articles need a complete rewrite: List of self-identified pederasts and pedophilesChildlove movementpedophiliaChild sexualityChild pornographyChild sexual abuseCapturing the FriedmansRind et al. I put the german articles on the list of articles that lack neutrality and need more care - the latter was immediately reverted by guess who. Please help taking care of the trouble.
Get-back-world-respect de:Benutzer:Stardust. And be sure that I did judge their output. I'd suggest that the links right at the top of this section should be categorised like the others in subsections. Regarding the links to the 3 news stories one BBC, two Guardianunless these are directly referenced somehow in which case put them in references I'm not convinced they're worth linking to. If we started linking every article in the media regarding child porn we'd have hundreds of links, and these don't look to be particularly in-depth or original.
Apologise, but, little teen cute nn was specially
At the least they should be clearly dated. WhiteCat25 January UTC. I noticed on your recent changes you put in 'directly'.
While I do agree that simulated child porn doesn't directly harm children, I also don't think it harms them period. What evidence is there for simulated child porn encouraging child molestation? Probably about as much as video games encouraging gun violence. I think it's an outlet that DECREASES the real-world transpirings.
Let's say that crime-media encouraged criminals to commit similar crimes. By that method of thinking, shouldn't the news be censored in airing murders and terrorist attacks, as they would only encourage the crimes? Tyciol31 January UTC. That is a pretty serious claim to make for it to be left so vague. I would like to see a mention of which "available studies" show that or at least see some resources cited for that statement.
I think your numerous entries and admissions in this discussion make it abundantly clear where your interests lie Tyciol.
I think you'd do well to stop ego-buffing yourself as a member of the self-appointed intelligensia and hope that you grow out of these interests before you get much older. You are being watched. I don't remember enough specifics to properly cite this, but I've seen at least one study that shows this to be true - in New Zealand if I remember correctly.
Also, there's a "sexual deviancy rehabilitation clinic" forgot the actual name nearby that the local courts order sex offenders to get therapy at, and I went in and took a look in the lobby once.
I saw people as young as maybe 10 or 11 years old, and I was really confused until I read that New Zealand study. I'm guessing some of those kids broke child pornography laws, or committed some other sex-related crime.
Qwasty13 September UTC. I think this part of the article needs serious work. It actually has nothing to do with society's perception of child pornography.
Instead, its a list of unverified exceptional cases where anti-child abuse laws have been criticised as taken to extremes. As such, I think it violates the NPOV code. I wouldn't say its defending child pornography, but I question the motivations behind publishing this kind of information in such a one-sided way. The article says that the Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition ruling allows for simulated child porn.
But what about this: ?
The vulva is the part of your genitals on the outside of your body - your labia, clitoris, vaginal opening, and the opening to the urethra (the hole you pee out of). While vaginas are just one part of the vulva, many people say "vagina" when they really mean the vulva. But the vulva has a lot more going on than just the vagina Daddy's Little Girls photos, including production stills, premiere photos and other event photos, publicity photos, behind-the-scenes, and more Since so little argument has been offered by the opposition, I will move for mediation, and then arbitration if anyone wants to dispute this further. I'll wait a bit for responses before I add the section back in. Qwasty , 27 August (UTC) No court has called the image porn, and in fact is highly unlikely to do so
Sure he had real stuff on his computer, but he also got nailed for the mangas as well. Themself is not a word. The correct word is themselvesand may be used as a generic singular in these instances. The following information is based on a story in the national Algemeen Dagblad newspaper in the Netherlands. It's all over the news in the Netherlands today. I'm wondering if it should go into the article as the second sentence in the keywords para of the Commercial production and distribution section.
There's no telling if anything will come of it, or how far it will go. Just dropping it off here for others to decide:. AvB ? talk17 March UTC. Yeah, I was seduced and subsequently molested by Wikipedia back in the late 60's True story. Is it illegal for children to view child pornography?
I get the impression it is reading through the talk page, in which case: is it illegal by laws saying "child porn is illegal, and that's it," or by specifying age-groups? Is it legal for children to view porn at all? Could the answer be noted briefly in the article? It's relevant, seeing as teenagers do view the stuff.
Njal29 April UTC. I was molested at age 7 by a guy who had piles of ponography all over his house and a Nazi flag in his den. It was SICK, SICK, SICK, Dont come off and tell me its harmless as long as whatever. Normal Pornography, when in the hands of some asshole who is "infatuated with children" can cause him to do "EVIL" things that he might not have done otherwise.
These asshole criminals should be "CASTRATED" while awake, "REAMED" and then sent to jail with tattos on thier heads that say "Child Molester!
wake up and see it! I think people should only have sex with people as old as them. Adult people who molest children are just as disgusting as old people who engage in sexual acts with young "consenting lol" people.
That little teen cute nn was and with
Cuzandor5 June UTC. Dear merlinus1 The only conection made from parents who abuse there kids either with pain or sex, is that it happened to them.
amazing net is one of those stores owned but that stock company. And many people "read" porn mags, child rape is a small compared to the number of slut out there.
FyiFoff 18 November EST. You need a CITATION that there's a stigma attached to child porn!? Can't somebody even write that lawnmowers cut grass without needing a citation?
I was going to say something about that, the 'citation needed' really needs to be romoved. Of course, because you are browsing Wikipedo judging by this discussion. Maybe Tyciol should set up a sub-site? I'm pretty sure that the "artist merit" of written materials isn't involved. Such texts are protected under "freedom of speech", right? It would be great if this article could explain this inconsistency. If virtual child porn per the statutory definition depictions of a minor, whether real or imaginary, engaged in a sexual act has supposedly been "proven" to contribute to the act of child sexual abuse, then why does text describing the very same acts of sexual exploitation with a minor not have a similar psycological effect?
Was some government-funded evaluation performed to determine if inducement to engage in a criminal activity is relieved when it is experienced in textual rather than visual form? What about auditory child pornography. Is that protected by free speech?
And what about a role-playing fantasies whereby an actor molests a blow-up doll of a child in a stageplay. That would appear to encourage child sexual abuse. However, in this scenario there is technically no visual depiction of a minor involved because it is a live stageplay which itself has artistic merit.
Is this also protected by free speech? Clearly, the U. law in this respect still has a lot of loopholes and inconsistencies that need to be remedied. Word selection in various sections reveals POV i.
Marcelino Kids - Fall Winter 2018/2019 Full Fashion Show - Exclusive
e "Most people are prosecuted MERELY" capitals added. The content tend's to favour child pornography or at least a more liberal attitude to it quantitively. For example placing a few ancedotes about unreasonable reactions to the threat of child pornography would not be POV but almost the entire section on the social perception of child pornography is constituted by this.
Quote's given in the article are almost all the sorts of quotes that would be cited by those who are libertrain towards child pornography and those in favour of child pornography. And you've put back the frankly perplexing 'Example' section that I reverted, giving no reason why.
The comparisons between the Trang Bang photograph and the description of a pornographic image in that Utah case despite being inappropriately applied to this famous picture no matter what statement you're trying to make are POV. And for the last time, Wikipedia is not censored : there is no need to put a ridiculous 'warning' for the reader in an encyclopaedia. I'm going to remove this section again, and please don't put it back until you respond to these concerns.
Frivolous accusations of vandalism won't get you very far. Please review WP:OR. Your comparison of the child pornography standards to the Vietnamese photo is an original analysis, and hence inappropriate to Wikipedia. First of all, I am not at all sure of the propriety of cutting and pasting a whole series of someone else's comments from personal user talk to the talk page of an article.
Of course I have no reason to mind my words being here. However, moving them was extraordinarily high-handed. Secondly, you are misleading in referring to the Dost factors while not listing them or providing background - and most of all in listing only four of the six, when mention of the other two would have immediately revealed the falseness of your comparison.
Thirdly, an acknowledged problem of standards of pornography discussed in the article is that their application to any given image is extremely subjective. Plainly you are making an evaluative judgment, and not a simple statement of fact. Your pretense otherwise is disingenuous. So, that's why I'm going to delete your POV OR again. note: I apologize for marking this deletion as a minor edit - it was accidental. Firstly, everyone should obey the Three revert rule.
Non-neutral point of view nor Original reseach are usually considered vandalism, so I don't see an exception to the three revert rule here. That said, I do think the section is original research, and have removed it.
Opinion you little teen cute nn are mistaken
Courts are there to interpert the law, Wikipedia will report on their interpertation or the verifiable interpertation of expertsbut it is not up to us to decide if something meets a legal standard or not.
the Dost factors now have a decent treatment under the american section of the definitions, but perhaps it's worthy of it's own article? Qwasty26 August UTC. I submit that original research is not something which is immediately obvious. So, which part is original research? I'm sure I could find a cite somewhere for each feature of the photo. Although governments rarely publish examples of what they consider to be child pornography, they sometimes provide detailed descriptions:.
The above description is for a photograph that cannot be published, however the 4 parts of the ruling can be illustrated by the Pulitzer prize -winning nude photograph of 9 year old Kim Phucin a peculiar pain-induced pose from injuries sustained during the Vietnam War. The photo meets all 4 of the primary criteria used by the above court to determine whether an image is child pornography:.
However, it should be noted that there are no known instances where the example photo has been officially considered child pornography. Since this discussion seems to have been fully explored, I have put an examples section back in, with a few very slight differences from the one shown above:. The above description is for an illegal photograph that cannot be published. However, the 4 primary criteria used by the above court can be illustrated by the Pulitzer prize -winning nude photograph of 9 year old Kim Phucin a peculiar pain-induced pose from injuries sustained during the Vietnam War :.
However, it should be noted that there are no known instances where the example photo has been considered child pornography .
Teen MILF 4 Teenage Perverts 2 Young Wet Horny 5 A Rare Case Of Girlstuckoncock All Ditz and Jumbo Tits 9 Asseaters Unanimous 20 Best Queens Of Squirt Big Breasted Nurses 2 Big Tit Fixation 1 Big Tits at School 6 Blow Bang 1 Blown Away 2 Bust Lust 1 Busty At this point in the season, we've pretty much been sticking to a uniform that involves bikinis, denim shorts, sandals, and little else. Typically, there's only one objective during these summer weekends, and that's to get as much sun as possible, wearing one of the barely there bikinis that are designed to maximize sun exposure and minimize tan indiataazakhabar.com Most Helpful Girls. It might get a little bigger. Guys usually stop growing, physically, at Your muscles will keep growing until you're As to whether it's enough, it all depends on the girl
Qwasty: The basic message doesn't seem to be getting through, maybe because you've gotten everyone to argue the trees instead of the forest. The basic problem with your examples section, in the form in which you keep adding it, is not that it violates a particular policy which is not to say that it doesn'tit's that half or more of it hasn't got a fucking thing to do with the article. And if that's not a good enough reason for you, I can only assume nothing would be.
PurplePlatypus16 September UTC. I agree with TeaDrinker that those cites Qwasty just restored are non-notable. They're also POV, in being chosen to illustrate a series of points in a persuasive argument. I have gone ahead and re-written the sections, combining them into one section . Let me explain my reasons here:.
Any thoughts? I am opposed to removal of the section, but I think it is acceptable in it's current form for now. I'd like to make some changes, fill in some missing cites, etc, and perhaps argue some points, but I'll have to come back to this discussion later since I've run out of free time for this.
But, I do have more information, and what I don't have, I bet I can dig up somewhere. See you in a few days or weeks. As such, the final decision as to whether an image is pornographic is made by a judge. Since the context of the image may indicate the sexual nature of the image, the nature or even name of the website on which it is displayed may be considered .
While some laws seem to exempt prosecutors from being required to prove the age and hence, the identity of the person depicted Utah Code, Title 76, Chapter 05a, Sexual Exploitation of Children USAefforts are made to identify victims to bolster a prosecution . When the law prohibits the distribution of child pornography, the evidence of the case may be largely inaccessible to the defense [ citation needed ]and specifically unavailable for publishing to as-yet unknown individuals who may be able to identify the depicted person.
OK that leaves the first paragraph only.
Little teen cute nn
Herostratus4 September UTC. I heard somewhere that in the United States, they were revising if anime, or drawings of children, should be considered Child Porn. I was just wondering if Shotacon and Lolicon have been dubbed illegal or if this accusation is true. Although it isn't really necessary, there's no reason not to include an example. I, personally, don't really have a problem with including something like this at the end of the United States section a separate subsection is not needed, I don't think :.
The following section referencing Kim Phuc is, besides of course being transparently polemical in intent, is just odius. I thought I'd seen it all, but I guess you learn something new every day.
Think, little teen cute nn here casual
Herostratus14 September UTC. Here's a link referring to a number of cases in which the interpretation of Dost was established. Just sticking it here for referral purposes. I have edited the phrase "certain council-owned properties" to read "public swimming pools" under the "Social Perception" section.
The article cited clearly states that the photography bans applied to pools, which is noteworthy considering how little clothing is worn by the athletes involved.
I think it would be dishonest to not make this distinction in the text of the article. There's lots of language here that asserts a particular point of view is supported by "studies.
In a couple days, I'm going to be cutting stuff left with a fact tag. Okay, it's been a couple of days - I'm gonna start snipping stuff with fact tags. Exactly as the name suggests, "floss" bikinis feature super-thin straps for a barely-there look that's also great if you're trying to minimize your tan lines, but be warned: These are definitely on the minimal side when it comes to coverage.
Next up, we have the loincloth bikini trend. Featuring ruched or scrunched-up material, this skin-baring trend seems to be really taking off this summer. Color me a little shocked to see dozens of trendsetters sporting the look and even more surprised at myself for wanting to try it.
Pretty sure this one speaks for itself, but I'll spell it out in case anything's not clear. See what I did there? Transparent and see-through straps are the ultimate trompe l'oeil, giving off the illusion that nothing is there.
Discover artworks, explore venues and meet artists. Art UK is the online home for every public collection in the UK. Featuring over , artworks by over 50, artists I'll speak to them and be nice but don't treat it like a big deal as if it were a woman your age you had to let down. she'll get over it, just be nice and treat her with the "aww that's cute". don't be alone with her or give her extra attention but be generally friendly. that's what I do. that way the kid gets to have their little crush and you can handle it without being awkward or 2 days ago Little women. Mums say they boost self-esteem. Critics say they sexualise kids. We visit the bling-filled frontline of children's beauty pageants. T hey meet in secret to avoid the protesters, the
With a healthy dose of nostalgia, we're seeing the return of ultra-high-cut swimsuits that give a nod to retro style.
Cool as they may be, I'd be lying if I said that I'm used to baring that much skin above my hips. Maybe it's just me, though! Another inventive way to wear the barely there swim trend right now is via cutout bandeau tops. Whether cut out in the middle or underneath to highlight a little underboob actionthis trend is quickly gaining steam.
Thong bikinis have been on the rise since last summer, and now they're a full-blown trend. As in, they're no longer only popular with a select group of fashion girls-they're everywhere. Next, see the most daring celebrity swimsuit trends of the year.